You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Fluid management in ARDS: an evaluation of current practice and the association between early diuretic use and hospital mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00496-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin P. Seitz, Ellen S. Caldwell, Catherine L. Hough |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 40 | 24% |
United States | 18 | 11% |
Argentina | 4 | 2% |
Peru | 4 | 2% |
Honduras | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Colombia | 3 | 2% |
Chile | 2 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Unknown | 71 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 135 | 81% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 12% |
Scientists | 10 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#408,432
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#12
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,993
of 437,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.