You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the CYP-IAPT transformation of child and adolescent mental health services in Cambridgeshire, UK: a qualitative implementation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-020-00078-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne-Marie Burn, Maris Vainre, Ayla Humphrey, Emma Howarth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Iceland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 18 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,447,320
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#24
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,627
of 436,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.