↓ Skip to main content

Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid quantification of plant-powdery mildew interactions by qPCR and conidiospore counts
Published in
Plant Methods, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-8-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf Weßling, Ralph Panstruga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 31%
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 73%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Engineering 3 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#627
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,774
of 187,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.