↓ Skip to main content

Hydroxychloroquine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: whole blood is preferable but serum levels also detect non-adherence

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,404)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6879 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydroxychloroquine levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: whole blood is preferable but serum levels also detect non-adherence
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13075-020-02291-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoit Blanchet, Moez Jallouli, Marie Allard, Pascale Ghillani-Dalbin, Lionel Galicier, Olivier Aumaître, François Chasset, Véronique Le Guern, Frédéric Lioté, Amar Smail, Nicolas Limal, Laurent Perard, Hélène Desmurs-Clavel, Du Le Thi Huong, Bouchra Asli, Jean-Emmanuel Kahn, Laurent Sailler, Félix Ackermann, Thomas Papo, Karim Sacré, Olivier Fain, Jérôme Stirnemann, Patrice Cacoub, Gaelle Leroux, Judith Cohen-Bittan, Jérémie Sellam, Xavier Mariette, Claire Goulvestre, Jean Sébastien Hulot, Zahir Amoura, Michel Vidal, Jean-Charles Piette, Noémie Jourde-Chiche, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,879 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#10,440
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2
of 3,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#481
of 432,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.