You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clonal tracing reveals diverse patterns of response to immune checkpoint blockade
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-020-02166-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shengqing Stan Gu, Xiaoqing Wang, Xihao Hu, Peng Jiang, Ziyi Li, Nicole Traugh, Xia Bu, Qin Tang, Chenfei Wang, Zexian Zeng, Jingxin Fu, Cliff Meyer, Yi Zhang, Paloma Cejas, Klothilda Lim, Jin Wang, Wubing Zhang, Collin Tokheim, Avinash Das Sahu, Xiaofang Xing, Benjamin Kroger, Zhangyi Ouyang, Henry Long, Gordon J. Freeman, Myles Brown, X. Shirley Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 80% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,843,744
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,537
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,538
of 435,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#40
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.