↓ Skip to main content

Comparing two methods for deriving dietary patterns associated with risk of metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and elderly Taiwanese adults with impaired kidney function

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing two methods for deriving dietary patterns associated with risk of metabolic syndrome among middle-aged and elderly Taiwanese adults with impaired kidney function
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-01142-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adi Lukas Kurniawan, Chien-Yeh Hsu, Hsiu-An Lee, Hsiao-Hsien Rau, Rathi Paramastri, Ahmad Syauqy, Jane C.-J. Chao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 13 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 15 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,874,781
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#837
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,168
of 415,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.