| Title |
Factors influencing liberation from mechanical ventilation in coronavirus disease 2019: multicenter observational study in fifteen Italian ICUs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40560-020-00499-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Gamberini, Tommaso Tonetti, Savino Spadaro, Gianluca Zani, Carlo Alberto Mazzoli, Chiara Capozzi, Emanuela Giampalma, Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani, Elisabetta Bertellini, Andrea Castelli, Irene Cavalli, Davide Colombo, Federico Crimaldi, Federica Damiani, Alberto Fogagnolo, Maurizio Fusari, Emiliano Gamberini, Giovanni Gordini, Cristiana Laici, Maria Concetta Lanza, Mirco Leo, Andrea Marudi, Giuseppe Nardi, Irene Ottaviani, Raffaella Papa, Antonella Potalivo, Emanuele Russo, Stefania Taddei, Carlo Alberto Volta, V. Marco Ranieri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 6 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 53 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,629,172
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#126
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,362
of 422,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.