↓ Skip to main content

Surveillance considerations for malaria elimination

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surveillance considerations for malaria elimination
Published in
Malaria Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victoria C Barclay, Rachel A Smith, Jill L Findeis

Abstract

Constant malaria monitoring and surveillance systems have been highlighted as critical for malaria elimination. The absence of robust monitoring and surveillance systems able to respond to outbreaks in a timely manner undeniably contributed to the failure of the last global attempt to eradicate malaria. Today, technological advances could allow for rapid detection of focal outbreaks and improved deployment of diagnostic and treatment supplies to areas needing support. However, optimizing diffusion activities (e.g., distributing vector controls and medicines, as well as deploying behaviour change campaigns) requires networks of diverse scholars to monitor, learn, and evaluate data and multiple organizations to coordinate their intervention activities. Surveillance systems that can gather, store and process information, from communities to national levels, in a centralized, widely accessible system will allow tailoring of surveillance and intervention efforts. Different systems and, thus reactions, will be effective in different endemic, geographical or socio-cultural contexts. Investing in carefully designed monitoring technologies, built for a multiple-acter, dynamic system, will help to improve malaria elimination efforts by improving the coordination, timing, coverage, and deployment of malaria technologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Indonesia 2 1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 123 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 29%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 20 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,001,744
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#5,264
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,549
of 175,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#86
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.