↓ Skip to main content

Microbial diversity and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation potential in an oil-contaminated mangrove sediment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial diversity and anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation potential in an oil-contaminated mangrove sediment
Published in
BMC Microbiology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-12-186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luiza L Andrade, Deborah CA Leite, Edir M Ferreira, Lívia Q Ferreira, Geraldo R Paula, Michael J Maguire, Casey RJ Hubert, Raquel S Peixoto, Regina MCP Domingues, Alexandre S Rosado

Abstract

Mangrove forests are coastal wetlands that provide vital ecosystem services and serve as barriers against natural disasters like tsunamis, hurricanes and tropical storms. Mangroves harbour a large diversity of organisms, including microorganisms with important roles in nutrient cycling and availability. Due to tidal influence, mangroves are sites where crude oil from spills farther away can accumulate. The relationship between mangrove bacterial diversity and oil degradation in mangrove sediments remains poorly understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 35%
Environmental Science 30 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,732,278
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,584
of 3,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,544
of 169,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#25
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.