↓ Skip to main content

Physical-chemical and microbiological changes in Cerrado Soil under differing sugarcane harvest management systems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical-chemical and microbiological changes in Cerrado Soil under differing sugarcane harvest management systems
Published in
BMC Microbiology, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-12-170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caio TCC Rachid, Marisa C Piccolo, Deborah Catharine A Leite, Fabiano C Balieiro, Heitor Luiz C Coutinho, Jan Dirk van Elsas, Raquel S Peixoto, Alexandre S Rosado

Abstract

Sugarcane cultivation plays an important role in Brazilian economy, and it is expanding fast, mainly due to the increasing demand for ethanol production. In order to understand the impact of sugarcane cultivation and management, we studied sugarcane under different management regimes (pre-harvest burn and mechanical, unburnt harvest, or green cane), next to a control treatment with native vegetation. The soil bacterial community structure (including an evaluation of the diversity of the ammonia oxidizing (amoA) and denitrifying (nirK) genes), greenhouse gas flow and several soil physicochemical properties were evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
Thailand 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 102 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 40%
Environmental Science 22 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2017.
All research outputs
#3,710,309
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#333
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,280
of 184,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.