You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential research ethics violations against an indigenous tribe in Ecuador: a mixed methods approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00542-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Esteban Ortiz-Prado, Katherine Simbaña-Rivera, Lenin Gómez-Barreno, Leonardo Tamariz, Alex Lister, Juan Carlos Baca, Alegria Norris, Lila Adana-Diaz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 35 | 41% |
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 93% |
| Scientists | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 18% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 24% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#625,930
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#33
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,623
of 440,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.