↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Combined subthalamic and nucleus basalis of Meynert deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease with dementia (DEMPARK-DBS): protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combined subthalamic and nucleus basalis of Meynert deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease with dementia (DEMPARK-DBS): protocol of a randomized, sham-controlled trial
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-00086-w
Pubmed ID
33324941
Authors

Christine Daniels, Frank Steigerwald, Philipp Capetian, Cordula Matthies, Uwe Malzahn, Peter U. Heuschmann, Jens Volkmann

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 16%
Psychology 6 12%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#12,680,754
of 19,782,046 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#55
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,467
of 389,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#23
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,782,046 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.