↓ Skip to main content

Role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Anti-Müllerian Hormone in pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a review
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12958-015-0134-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agathe Dumont, Geoffroy Robin, Sophie Catteau-Jonard, Didier Dewailly

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common cause of chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenism in young women. Excessive ovarian production of Anti-Müllerian Hormone, secreted by growing follicles in excess, is now considered as an important feature of PCOS. The aim of this review is first to update the current knowledge about the role of AMH in the pathophysiology of PCOS. Then, this review will discuss the improvement that serum AMH assay brings in the diagnosis of PCOS. Last, this review will explain the utility of serum AMH assay in the management of infertility in women with PCOS and its utility as a marker of treatment efficiency on PCOS symptoms. It must be emphasized however that the lack of an international standard for the serum AMH assay, mainly because of technical issues, makes it difficult to define consensual thresholds, and thus impairs the widespread use of this new ovarian marker. Hopefully, this should soon improve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 242 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 55 23%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 75 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,033,703
of 24,285,692 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#221
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,813
of 398,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,285,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.