| Title |
SARS-CoV-2 detection in the lower respiratory tract of invasively ventilated ARDS patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03323-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niccolò Buetti, Paul-Henri Wicky, Quentin Le Hingrat, Stéphane Ruckly, Timothy Mazzuchelli, Ambre Loiodice, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Valentina Forni Ogna, Etienne de Montmollin, Enos Bernasconi, Benoit Visseaux, Jean-François Timsit |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,079,119
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,861
of 6,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,909
of 417,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.