↓ Skip to main content

Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 1,644)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
60 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-enabled insights into the biology of thrips as crop pests
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12915-020-00862-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorith Rotenberg, Aaron A. Baumann, Sulley Ben-Mahmoud, Olivier Christiaens, Wannes Dermauw, Panagiotis Ioannidis, Chris G. C. Jacobs, Iris M. Vargas Jentzsch, Jonathan E. Oliver, Monica F. Poelchau, Swapna Priya Rajarapu, Derek J. Schneweis, Simon Snoeck, Clauvis N. T. Taning, Dong Wei, Shirani M. K. Widana Gamage, Daniel S. T. Hughes, Shwetha C. Murali, Samuel T. Bailey, Nicolas E. Bejerman, Christopher J. Holmes, Emily C. Jennings, Andrew J. Rosendale, Andrew Rosselot, Kaylee Hervey, Brandi A. Schneweis, Sammy Cheng, Christopher Childers, Felipe A. Simão, Ralf G. Dietzgen, Hsu Chao, Huyen Dinh, Harsha Vardhan Doddapaneni, Shannon Dugan, Yi Han, Sandra L. Lee, Donna M. Muzny, Jiaxin Qu, Kim C. Worley, Joshua B. Benoit, Markus Friedrich, Jeffery W. Jones, Kristen A. Panfilio, Yoonseong Park, Hugh M. Robertson, Guy Smagghe, Diane E. Ullman, Maurijn van der Zee, Thomas Van Leeuwen, Jan A. Veenstra, Robert M. Waterhouse, Matthew T. Weirauch, John H. Werren, Anna E. Whitfield, Evgeny M. Zdobnov, Richard A. Gibbs, Stephen Richards

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#211,792
of 18,949,038 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#41
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,618
of 386,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#6
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,949,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.