You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of venous Doppler to predict adverse kidney events in a general ICU cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03330-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rory Spiegel, William Teeter, Scott Sullivan, Keegan Tupchong, Nabeel Mohammed, Mark Sutherland, Evan Leibner, Philippe Rola, Samuel M. Galvagno, Sarah B. Murthi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 7 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 16% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,276,922
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,063
of 6,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,985
of 440,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.