↓ Skip to main content

Designing low-cost, accurate cervical screening strategies that take into account COVID-19: a role for self-sampled HPV typing

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Designing low-cost, accurate cervical screening strategies that take into account COVID-19: a role for self-sampled HPV typing
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13027-020-00325-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayode Olusegun Ajenifuja, Jerome Belinson, Andrew Goldstein, Kanan T. Desai, Silvia de Sanjose, Mark Schiffman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 23 24%
Unknown 30 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 38 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2020.
All research outputs
#20,658,463
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#484
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#355,403
of 415,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.