You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient and public involvement of young people with a chronic condition: lessons learned and practical tips from a large participatory program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-020-00234-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Femke van Schelven, Eline van der Meulen, Noortje Kroeze, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Hennie Boeije |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 35% |
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 16% |
| Psychology | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,991,260
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#255
of 501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,089
of 419,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.