↓ Skip to main content

DPI-ELISA: a fast and versatile method to specify the binding of plant transcription factors to DNA in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DPI-ELISA: a fast and versatile method to specify the binding of plant transcription factors to DNA in vitro
Published in
Plant Methods, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-6-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luise H Brand, Tobias Kirchler, Sabine Hummel, Christina Chaban, Dierk Wanke

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 110 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 11 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,576,585
of 20,275,020 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#434
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,688
of 392,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#74
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,275,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.