You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identifying interventions with Gypsies, Roma and Travellers to promote immunisation uptake: methodological approach and findings
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09614-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lisa Dyson, Helen Bedford, Louise Condon, Carol Emslie, Lana Ireland, Julie Mytton, Karen Overend, Sarah Redsell, Zoe Richardson, Cath Jackson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 50% |
Ireland | 2 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 18 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,504,994
of 23,938,580 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,053
of 15,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,209
of 422,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#91
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,938,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.