You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why do they do it? A grounded theory study of the use of low-value care among primary health care physicians
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01052-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sara Ingvarsson, Hanna Augustsson, Henna Hasson, Per Nilsen, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Mia von Knorring |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 22% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Sweden | 2 | 9% |
Finland | 2 | 9% |
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
Scientists | 7 | 30% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 6 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,474,047
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#488
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,810
of 443,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.