↓ Skip to main content

Supporting meningitis diagnosis amongst infants and children through the use of fuzzy cognitive mapping

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Supporting meningitis diagnosis amongst infants and children through the use of fuzzy cognitive mapping
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vijay K Mago, Ravinder Mehta, Ryan Woolrych, Elpiniki I Papageorgiou

Abstract

Meningitis is characterized by an inflammation of the meninges, or the membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. Early diagnosis and treatment is crucial for a positive outcome, yet identifying meningitis is a complex process involving an array of signs and symptoms and multiple causal factors which require novel solutions to support clinical decision-making. In this work, we explore the potential of fuzzy cognitive map to assist in the modeling of meningitis, as a support tool for physicians in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of the condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 24 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Computer Science 10 11%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 30 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2012.
All research outputs
#13,019,526
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#914
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,253
of 169,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#27
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.