↓ Skip to main content

Drug resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Madang, Papua New Guinea

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug resistance-conferring mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Madang, Papua New Guinea
Published in
BMC Microbiology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-12-191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Ballif, Paul Harino, Serej Ley, Mireia Coscolla, Stefan Niemann, Robyn Carter, Christopher Coulter, Sonia Borrell, Peter Siba, Suparat Phuanukoonnon, Sebastien Gagneux, Hans-Peter Beck

Abstract

Monitoring drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential to curb the spread of tuberculosis (TB). Unfortunately, drug susceptibility testing is currently not available in Papua New Guinea (PNG) and that impairs TB control in this country. We report for the first time M. tuberculosis mutations associated with resistance to first and second-line anti-TB drugs in Madang, PNG. A molecular cluster analysis was performed to identify M. tuberculosis transmission in that region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#1,393
of 3,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,465
of 170,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#22
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.