You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Artificial neural networks improve LDCT lung cancer screening: a comparative validation study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-020-07465-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yin-Chen Hsu, Yuan-Hsiung Tsai, Hsu-Huei Weng, Li-Sheng Hsu, Ying-Huang Tsai, Yu-Ching Lin, Ming-Szu Hung, Yu-Hung Fang, Chien-Wei Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
Engineering | 3 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,097,821
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,040
of 8,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,690
of 419,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#73
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.