↓ Skip to main content

Prospective evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy in untreated late stage non-squamous lung carcinoma in a single institution

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy in untreated late stage non-squamous lung carcinoma in a single institution
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12967-020-02259-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Heeke, Véronique Hofman, Marius Ilié, Maryline Allegra, Virginie Lespinet, Olivier Bordone, Jonathan Benzaquen, Jacques Boutros, Michel Poudenx, Salomé Lalvée, Virginie Tanga, Carole Salacroup, Christelle Bonnetaud, Charles-Hugo Marquette, Paul Hofman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,642,530
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,293
of 4,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,259
of 360,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#47
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.