You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recommendations for hemodynamic monitoring for critically ill children—expert consensus statement issued by the cardiovascular dynamics section of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03326-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yogen Singh, Javier Urbano Villaescusa, Eduardo M. da Cruz, Shane M. Tibby, Gabriella Bottari, Rohit Saxena, Marga Guillén, Jesus Lopez Herce, Matteo Di Nardo, Corrado Cecchetti, Joe Brierley, Willem de Boode, Joris Lemson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 27% |
| Scientists | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,104,207
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#868
of 6,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,662
of 441,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.