↓ Skip to main content

Fungal and bacterial microbiome dysbiosis and imbalance of trans‐kingdom network in asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Fungal and bacterial microbiome dysbiosis and imbalance of trans‐kingdom network in asthma
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13601-020-00345-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunrong Huang, Youchao Yu, Wei Du, Yahui Liu, Ranran Dai, Wei Tang, Ping Wang, Chenhong Zhang, Guochao Shi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,674,704
of 23,572,442 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#158
of 686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,646
of 421,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.