Title |
Ethical and human rights considerations in public health in low and middle-income countries: an assessment using the case of Uganda’s responses to COVID-19 pandemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00523-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Barugahare, Fredrick Nelson Nakwagala, Erisa Mwaka Sabakaki, Joseph Ochieng, Nelson K Sewankambo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Researcher | 13 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 19% |
Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 21% |
Unknown | 51 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2021.
All research outputs
#629,978
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#34
of 1,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,394
of 408,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.