↓ Skip to main content

A call for collaboration and consensus on training for endotracheal intubation in the medical intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A call for collaboration and consensus on training for endotracheal intubation in the medical intensive care unit
Published in
Critical Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-03317-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wade Brown, Lekshmi Santhosh, Anna K. Brady, Joshua L. Denson, Abesh Niroula, Meredith E. Pugh, Wesley H. Self, Aaron M. Joffe, P. O’Neal Maynord, W. Graham Carlos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 10 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,741,062
of 22,085,721 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,637
of 5,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,452
of 400,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#322
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,085,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.