↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors for recurrent tuberculosis after successful treatment in a high burden setting: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk factors for recurrent tuberculosis after successful treatment in a high burden setting: a cohort study
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12879-020-05515-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick George Tobias Cudahy, Douglas Wilson, Ted Cohen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 38 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 41 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#13,189,730
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,089
of 7,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,940
of 420,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#58
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.