↓ Skip to main content

Does availability of physical activity and food outlets differ by race and income? Findings from an enumeration study in a health disparate region

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does availability of physical activity and food outlets differ by race and income? Findings from an enumeration study in a health disparate region
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-9-105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennie L Hill, Clarice Chau, Candice R Luebbering, Korine K Kolivras, Jamie Zoellner

Abstract

Low-income, ethnic/racial minorities and rural populations are at increased risk for obesity and related chronic health conditions when compared to white, urban and higher-socio-economic status (SES) peers. Recent systematic reviews highlight the influence of the built environment on obesity, yet very few of these studies consider rural areas or populations. Utilizing a CBPR process, this study advances community-driven causal models to address obesity by exploring the difference in resources for physical activity and food outlets by block group race and income in a small regional city that anchors a rural health disparate region. To guide this inquiry we hypothesized that lower income and racially diverse block groups would have fewer food outlets, including fewer grocery stores and fewer physical activity outlets. We further hypothesized that walkability, as defined by a computed walkability index, would be lower in the lower income block groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 141 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 42 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2012.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,886
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,966
of 186,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.