You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Movement Ecology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40462-020-00229-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inês Silva, Matt Crane, Benjamin Michael Marshall, Colin Thomas Strine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 17% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#4,591,042
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#160
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,898
of 420,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.