↓ Skip to main content

Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models

Overview of attention for article published in Movement Ecology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models
Published in
Movement Ecology, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40462-020-00229-3
Authors

Inês Silva, Matt Crane, Benjamin Michael Marshall, Colin Thomas Strine

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 38%
Environmental Science 10 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,770,492
of 19,629,044 outputs
Outputs from Movement Ecology
#132
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,348
of 392,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Movement Ecology
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,629,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.