↓ Skip to main content

CTen: a web-based platform for identifying enriched cell types from heterogeneous microarray data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CTen: a web-based platform for identifying enriched cell types from heterogeneous microarray data
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-460
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason E Shoemaker, Tiago JS Lopes, Samik Ghosh, Yukiko Matsuoka, Yoshihiro Kawaoka, Hiroaki Kitano

Abstract

Interpreting in vivo sampled microarray data is often complicated by changes in the cell population demographics. To put gene expression into its proper biological context, it is necessary to distinguish differential gene transcription from artificial gene expression induced by changes in the cellular demographics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 100 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 12%
Computer Science 7 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,907
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,178
of 186,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#68
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.