↓ Skip to main content

Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
360 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-9-65
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Pennycott, Dario Wyss, Heike Vallery, Verena Klamroth-Marganska, Robert Riener

Abstract

Stroke is the most common cause of disability in the developed world and can severely degrade walking function. Robot-driven gait therapy can provide assistance to patients during training and offers a number of advantages over other forms of therapy. These potential benefits do not, however, seem to have been fully realised as of yet in clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 347 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 19%
Researcher 41 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 8%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 61 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 142 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Neuroscience 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 78 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#778
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,097
of 187,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.