↓ Skip to main content

Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
59 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building capacity in dissemination and implementation science: a systematic review of the academic literature on teaching and training initiatives
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-01051-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Davis, Danielle D’Lima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 44 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Psychology 8 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 42 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#913,710
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#105
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,720
of 442,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.