Assessing risk of bias in human environmental epidemiology studies using three tools: different conclusions from different tools

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, October 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs: 1 blog

twitter: 9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 40 Mendeley

Summary Blogs X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 9 X posts from 9 X users, with an upper bound of 12,577 followers.

RT @stepheick: Very exiting to see that our paper (https://t.co/I3YwqlBXwF) was cited a few times in this NAS report on EPA’s TSCA method!!…

17 Feb 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

Interesting review comparing risk of bias tools in toxicology. It confirms findings from medicine that domain ratings are more useful than an overall score. OHAT and Navigation Guide were recommended https://t.co/1oxu1YzSUu

06 Nov 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @TraceyJWoodruff: Amazing work by @stepheick @GoinDana @JuleenLam and @NickZChartres demonstrating why the methods used to evaluate the…

02 Nov 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

Amazing work by @stepheick @GoinDana @JuleenLam and @NickZChartres demonstrating why the methods used to evaluate the quality of studies makes a difference to bottom line summary of the evidence -> which impacts health

30 Oct 2020

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 5 additional X posts.