Title |
How and why do French medical students choose the specialty of infectious and tropical diseases? A national cross-sectional study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12909-020-02317-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nathan Peiffer-Smadja, François-Daniel Ardellier, Pauline Thill, Anne-Lise Beaumont, Gaud Catho, Lindsay Osei, Vincent Dubée, Alexandre Bleibtreu, Adrien Lemaignen, Michaël Thy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 9 | 30% |
Spain | 2 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
Scientists | 8 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,864,034
of 23,972,269 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#236
of 3,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,138
of 423,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#7
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,972,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.