↓ Skip to main content

External validation of prognostic models predicting pre-eclampsia: individual participant data meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
External validation of prognostic models predicting pre-eclampsia: individual participant data meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12916-020-01766-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kym I. E. Snell, John Allotey, Melanie Smuk, Richard Hooper, Claire Chan, Asif Ahmed, Lucy C. Chappell, Peter Von Dadelszen, Marcus Green, Louise Kenny, Asma Khalil, Khalid S. Khan, Ben W. Mol, Jenny Myers, Lucilla Poston, Basky Thilaganathan, Anne C. Staff, Gordon C. S. Smith, Wessel Ganzevoort, Hannele Laivuori, Anthony O. Odibo, Javier Arenas Ramírez, John Kingdom, George Daskalakis, Diane Farrar, Ahmet A. Baschat, Paul T. Seed, Federico Prefumo, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Henk Groen, Francois Audibert, Jacques Masse, Ragnhild B. Skråstad, Kjell Å. Salvesen, Camilla Haavaldsen, Chie Nagata, Alice R. Rumbold, Seppo Heinonen, Lisa M. Askie, Luc J. M. Smits, Christina A. Vinter, Per Magnus, Kajantie Eero, Pia M. Villa, Anne K. Jenum, Louise B. Andersen, Jane E. Norman, Akihide Ohkuchi, Anne Eskild, Sohinee Bhattacharya, Fionnuala M. McAuliffe, Alberto Galindo, Ignacio Herraiz, Lionel Carbillon, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch, Seon Ae Yeo, Joyce L. Browne, Karel G. M. Moons, Richard D. Riley, Shakila Thangaratinam

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 33 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Unspecified 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 35 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,532,396
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,069
of 3,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,750
of 422,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#39
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,552 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.