You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do community scorecards improve utilisation of health services in community clinics: experience from a rural area of Bangladesh
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-020-01266-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. M. A. Hanifi, Aazia Hossain, Asiful Haidar Chowdhury, Shahidul Hoque, Mohammad Abdus Selim, Shehrin Shaila Mahmood, Abbas Bhuiya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 32 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,232,966
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,427
of 1,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,773
of 420,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#49
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.