You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants used by Baka people in southeastern Cameroon
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13002-020-00413-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pascal Eric Billong Fils, Natacha Afiong Nana, Jean Lagarde Betti, Oumar Farick Njimbam, Stéphanie Tientcheu Womeni, Eva Ávila Martin, Guillermo Ros Brull, Robert Okale, Julia E. Fa, Stephan M. Funk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 20% |
Argentina | 1 | 10% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,787,549
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#171
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,983
of 420,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.