Cavanaugh & Hussein (2020) Hmm not sure about this one. A letter arguing that psych journals should (according to SAGER guidelines) mandate reporting info on sex/gender diffs in sample. Any diff is likely to be spurious if not theoretically motivated.
RT @EggletonKim: "Only 8 journals (9.0%) instructed authors to address sex/gender within the abstract, introduction, and/or methods section…
"Only 8 journals (9.0%) instructed authors to address sex/gender within the abstract, introduction, and/or methods sections. No journals instructed authors to address sex and gender in the results or discussion sections." WOW. #ResearchIntegrity
Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science? #ResearchDesign https://t.co/INmK7iqkOH