Title |
Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-10-236 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guadalupe Corcobado, Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés, Eva De Mas, Jordi Moya-Laraño |
Abstract |
Explanations for the evolution of female-biased, extreme Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD), which has puzzled researchers since Darwin, are still controversial. Here we propose an extension of the Gravity Hypothesis (i.e., the GH, which postulates a climbing advantage for small males) that in conjunction with the fecundity hypothesis appears to have the most general power to explain the evolution of SSD in spiders so far. In this "Bridging GH" we propose that bridging locomotion (i.e., walking upside-down under own-made silk bridges) may be behind the evolution of extreme SSD. A biomechanical model shows that there is a physical constraint for large spiders to bridge. This should lead to a trade-off between other traits and dispersal in which bridging would favor smaller sizes and other selective forces (e.g. fecundity selection in females) would favor larger sizes. If bridging allows faster dispersal, small males would have a selective advantage by enjoying more mating opportunities. We predicted that both large males and females would show a lower propensity to bridge, and that SSD would be negatively correlated with sexual dimorphism in bridging propensity. To test these hypotheses we experimentally induced bridging in males and females of 13 species of spiders belonging to the two clades in which bridging locomotion has evolved independently and in which most of the cases of extreme SSD in spiders are found. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 3 | 4% |
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Réunion | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Israel | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Romania | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Other | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 62 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 23% |
Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 66% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |