↓ Skip to main content

Spillover HIV prevention effects of a cash transfer trial in East Zimbabwe: evidence from a cluster-randomised trial and general-population survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spillover HIV prevention effects of a cash transfer trial in East Zimbabwe: evidence from a cluster-randomised trial and general-population survey
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09667-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robin Schaefer, Ranjeeta Thomas, Laura Robertson, Jeffrey W. Eaton, Phyllis Mushati, Constance Nyamukapa, Katharina Hauck, Simon Gregson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Other 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Unspecified 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Psychology 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Unspecified 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 18 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#11,888,434
of 19,503,523 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,892
of 12,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,719
of 391,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#754
of 1,233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,503,523 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.