You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spillover HIV prevention effects of a cash transfer trial in East Zimbabwe: evidence from a cluster-randomised trial and general-population survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-09667-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robin Schaefer, Ranjeeta Thomas, Laura Robertson, Jeffrey W. Eaton, Phyllis Mushati, Constance Nyamukapa, Katharina Hauck, Simon Gregson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,456,862
of 23,257,423 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,485
of 15,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,037
of 420,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#202
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,257,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.