↓ Skip to main content

Media exposure to COVID-19 information, risk perception, social and geographical proximity, and self-rated anxiety in China

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Media exposure to COVID-19 information, risk perception, social and geographical proximity, and self-rated anxiety in China
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-09761-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miao Liu, Hongzhong Zhang, Hui Huang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Lecturer 10 6%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 64 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Psychology 21 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 11%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 71 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2021.
All research outputs
#12,673,649
of 19,233,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,681
of 12,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,896
of 390,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#857
of 1,231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,233,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.