↓ Skip to main content

The effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in pharmacologically treated patients with stable cardiovascular disease compared to usual care: a randomised…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of a comprehensive lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in pharmacologically treated patients with stable cardiovascular disease compared to usual care: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-12-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelmina IJzelenberg, Irene M Hellemans, Maurits W van Tulder, Martijn W Heymans, Jan A Rauwerda, Albert C van Rossum, Jaap C Seidell

Abstract

The additional benefit of lifestyle interventions in patients receiving cardioprotective drug treatment to improve cardiovascular risk profile is not fully established.The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of a target-driven multidisciplinary structured lifestyle intervention programme of 6 months duration aimed at maximum reduction of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with usual care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 200 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 16%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 11%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 56 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 64 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,289,681
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#135
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,849
of 169,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.