↓ Skip to main content

Urban gardening and neglected and underutilized species in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban gardening and neglected and underutilized species in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13002-020-00421-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Alves da Cunha, Lidice Almeida Arlego Paraguassú, José Geraldo de Aquino Assis, Arthur Benjamin de Paula Carvalho Silva, Ryzia de Cassia Vieira Cardoso

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 43 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 15%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Unspecified 4 4%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 47 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2021.
All research outputs
#14,989,663
of 23,262,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#492
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,076
of 420,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,262,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.