Title |
The Red flag! risk assessment among medical homeopaths in Norway: a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-150 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Trine Stub, Terje Alræk, Anita Salamonsen |
Abstract |
Homeopathy is widely used, and many European physicians practice homeopathy in addition to conventional medicine. Adverse effects in homeopathy are not expected by homeopaths due to the negligible quantities of active substances in a remedy. However, we questioned if homeopathic aggravation, which is described as a temporary worsening of existing symptoms following a correct homeopathic remedy, should be regarded as adverse effects or ruled out as desirable events of the treatment. In order to improve knowledge in an unexplored area of patient safety, we explored how medical homeopath discriminate between homeopathic aggravations and adverse effects, and how they assessed patient safety in medical practice. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 15% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
Psychology | 5 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 30% |