↓ Skip to main content

ANCAC: amino acid, nucleotide, and codon analysis of COGs – a tool for sequence bias analysis in microbial orthologs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ANCAC: amino acid, nucleotide, and codon analysis of COGs – a tool for sequence bias analysis in microbial orthologs
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-223
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arno Meiler, Claudia Klinger, Michael Kaufmann

Abstract

The COG database is the most popular collection of orthologous proteins from many different completely sequenced microbial genomes. Per definition, a cluster of orthologous groups (COG) within this database exclusively contains proteins that most likely achieve the same cellular function. Recently, the COG database was extended by assigning to every protein both the corresponding amino acid and its encoding nucleotide sequence resulting in the NUCOCOG database. This extended version of the COG database is a valuable resource connecting sequence features with the functionality of the respective proteins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
Germany 1 4%
Portugal 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 20 74%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 15%
Computer Science 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,285
of 7,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,771
of 168,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#74
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.