You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding the neuroprotective effect of tranexamic acid: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-3 randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03243-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Brenner, Antonio Belli, Rizwana Chaudhri, Timothy Coats, Lauren Frimley, Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin, Rashid Jooma, Raoul Mansukhani, Peter Sandercock, Haleema Shakur-Still, Temitayo Shokunbi, Ian Roberts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 24% |
| Mexico | 6 | 10% |
| Brazil | 3 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 49 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#816,248
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#606
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,786
of 434,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.