You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah White, Rhiannon Foster, Jacqueline Marks, Rosaleen Morshead, Lucy Goldsmith, Sally Barlow, Jacqueline Sin, Steve Gillard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 44% |
| Canada | 3 | 17% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 226 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 113 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 119 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,451,421
of 24,969,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#461
of 5,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,869
of 422,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#10
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,969,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.